Profession & Career

ESCMID Panorama

Study Group Research Funding


This funding is exclusively available for official ESCMID Study Group research projects in the fields of clinical microbiology and infectious diseases. Please do not apply, if you have not full support by one or more of ESCMID's Study Groups.


The maximum amount granted per project is EUR 30'000.

Application Deadline

Annual application deadline: 30 August 2018 => Deadline extended to 26 September 12:00 CEST

All applications received by the deadline will be assessed and you will receive feedback approx. 3 months after the deadline.

Eligibility criteria

The research project may be based on laboratory investigations, clinical studies, experimental animal studies, or a combination of these. Research must be carried out as a collaborative project involving at least two separate institutions in two different countries. Applications will be peer-reviewed and the best projects will be selected based on the application and research proposal (for details see next paragraph).

Applicants must be principal investigators for the proposed research. The Study Group(s) involved must display full support of this proposal by written approval by the Chairperson, Secretary and Treasurer of the respective Study Group(s). The applicants must be ESCMID members in good standing. Members of the ESCMID Executive Committee are ineligible.

What you need to apply

When submitting online, please have the following documentation ready.

  • PDF-Document (Surname_StudyGroup.pdf max 4MB) with the:

    • Summary of your research project (1 page including Gantt chart);
    • Project description (max. 7 pages) encompassing an introduction (objectives, background, rationale or purpose of the project); research plan (incl. design, material & methods, data analysis) and personnel and co-investigators (at least one additional institution from a country different than yours).
    • Budget (max. 1 page) including costs for personnel, equipment and consumables.
    • Description of your present research; CV; list of publications.

  • Scanned file(s) (Surname_support.pdf max 4MB) of supporting letter(s) of the Chairperson, Secretary and Treasurer of the Study Group(s) involved in this proposal.
  • A colour photograph as (Surname_Firstname.tiff, .eps or .jpg max 4MB) file at least 4 x 6 cm with 300 dpi resolution for publication

Online submission

How the proposal will be evaluated

The Scientific Affairs Subcommittee (SAS) and possibly external peer-reviewers will review your proposal focussing on the following issues:

Scientific and/or technological excellence
  • Soundness of concept and quality of objectives
  • Progress beyond state-of-the-art
  • Quality and effectiveness of the scientific/technological methodology and work plan
Quality and efficiency of the implementation and budgeting
  • Appropriateness of the collaborating partners as a whole in the project
  • Quality and relevant experience of the individual partners
  • Appropriateness of the allocation and justification of the resources to be committed (budget, staff, equipment)
  • Appropriate timing  and scope of work within timeframe
Parity issues
  • Geographic distribution of the partners
  • Gender balance

For a final decision, comparison with other proposals submitted in parallel and with already granted or running projects of the same group(s) might be taken into account.


The funding receiver must together with the Study Group(s) submit a two-page report to ESCMID upon completion of the research project. It should include:

  • A short introduction summarizing current knowledge for the non-specialist
  • The study hypothesis
  • The main findings
  • Conclusions from the investigation
  • Presentations (oral / poster) or publications originating from this project.

This report can be replaced by one (or more) peer-reviewed publication(s) covering the funded project.

If the project runs longer than one year, you are additionally requested to submit a brief progress report after half of the project duration.

The described outcome will be evaluated by one of the original peer-reviewers of the project.

Last update: 18 December 2017